Environmental Economics

 

Economics

Economics is the field that is concerned with the allocation of scarce resources to meet human needs. This includes what is produced, how it is produced, and how the output is distributed. It is concerned with the costs of producing and distributing goods and services.

The cost of using scarce resources for any one end is that those resources could be used for some other purpose. If we choose to spend the afternoon playing basketball, we can't use that time to study. If we purchase a sports utility vehicle, we are making a decision that benefits, such as safety or convenience, outweigh the costs of purchasing a smaller, more fuel-efficient car.

Economics is an important tool for making decisions about the conservation and protection of natural resources because it provides information about the choices people make, the costs and benefits of proposed measures, and the likely outcome of environmental (and other) policies. For example, if a city wants to encourage households to recycle, it might charge for trash pickup according to the total weight of trash the household generates. People would have an incentive to reduce the amount of trash they throw out. Incentives do not have to be monetary. A World Bank paper, for example, describes Indonesia's efforts to control pollution by publicizing how much each of the country's factories pollute. Avoiding bad publicity can be an incentive.

Environmental and other public policies are most effective when they achieve the maximum possible benefits in the most efficient way. Resources--human, natural, monetary--are not infinite. Policymakers, therefore, try to understand how resources can be utilized most efficiently to accomplish the desired goals by weighing the costs of various alternatives with their potential benefits.

And there are usually tradeoffs that have to be considered. We could prevent automobiles deaths (and reduce pollution) by banning automobiles, but that is a cost few are willing to accept. There are many different species that are threatened, yet public and private groups have spent more time and resources protecting elephants, whales, tigers, and other large animals than on preserving other species, because it is easier to raise money and interest for these charismatic creatures than for a lowly mollusk or weed. The choices we make reflect more than a simple calculation of monetary costs incurred, but also opportunities lost by not pursuing a different course of action.

 

Source:  www.enviroliteracy.org (March,2002)

 

Environmental issues frequently are acted upon using an economic cost-benefit analysis.  In this assignment we are going to Look at three issues:

           

1.      “Environmental regulation in the United States stands accused of causing a broad array of undesirable economic consequences.”  Is environmental protection bad for the economy?  Fact or Fiction?

2.      The United States has generally favored economic incentives as a viable method for reducing environmental impacts.  Does this method work?

3.      Environmentalists have long argued that improving the environment can reap economic benefits.  Are the environmentalists justified in their assessment.

 

Begin your study using the following link to the National Center for Environmental Economics-EPA   http://yosemite1.epa.gov/ee/epa/eed.nsf/pages/homepage by following the links to the appropriate topics.  Your assignment is to research the three issues and write a brief two-page report; double spaced with one inch margins using 10 or 12 pt font. You must cite your sources using either MLA or APA style guides.  Style guides can be found at-   http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/TeachingLib/Guides/Citations.html