Name___________________
Per _________ Date ______
Tragedy of
the Commons Simulation
Introduction:
The
purpose of this simulation is to explore how resources are used and
exploited when they are available to multiple
parties. The "tragedy of the
commons" is the situation in which
individuals use a common resource for
their own personal gain and degradation of
the commons results, leading to a
decrease in yield for both the group and the
individual. This simulation
should be written up as a lab report. During
the simulation, all data and
notes should be included in your lab
notebook. Be sure to read Hardin's
article
from posted on Mr. Redding's web page at www.cvhs.com
Materials:
m&m'sTM
Procedure:
Part
I:
Divide
yourselves into groups of four. Imagine
this scenario:
Each
person represents the head of a starving family which requires food (strong
motivation to acquire food). The only food source for these four families
is
a small fishing hole which can accommodate 16 fish. Fortunately, after each
round of fishing by the four family heads,
each remaining fish is able to
spontaneously reproduce and make one new fish (i.e.
4 fish become 8, to a
maximum of 16). Each person is allowed to take
as many or few fish as you
want, but if you take only one fish, your family
will starve.
In
this simulation, our pond is a beaker, and our fish are m&m'sTM
Fish
are caught using plastic spoons. Each fishing round will last for 1
minute. You should rotate your fishing order
every round so that everyone
has a chance to go first. At the end of every round, the number
of remaining
kisses will be doubled to simulate
reproduction. The simulation will
continue for several rounds.
Part
II:
This
part is exactly like the first, except that in this simulation,
everyone has a private pond in addition to the
common pond. The private
ponds can only hold 3 fish although all
other rules apply. You may catch as
many fish as you would like from both ponds
during each round.
Results:
1. All data should be recorded in the
following tables.
Part I: Commons pond
|
|
Round
1 |
Round
2 |
Round
3 |
Round
4 |
Round
5 |
|
Starting
# |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#
Taken |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#
Replaced |
|
|
|
|
|
Part II: Commons pond
|
|
Round
1 |
Round
2 |
Round
3 |
Round
4 |
Round
5 |
|
Starting
# |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#
Taken |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#
Replaced |
|
|
|
|
|
Part II: Private pond
|
|
Round
1 |
Round
2 |
Round
3 |
Round
4 |
Round
5 |
|
Starting
# |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#
Taken |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#
Replaced |
|
|
|
|
|
2. Calculate:
a. The total number of fish caught by
each person
b. The total amount of fish that could
have been taken from the pond over
the trial if
the fish had been managed perfectly.
c.
Your "management score" = what percent of the total possible
amount of
fish that could be caught by all
fishers, were actually caught?
Questions:
1-what happened to the common resource in the
in Part I? Why?
2-did you get different results for the pond in
Part II? Why?
3 -if you cooperated with other fishers, what
was the result of that
cooperation?
4 -did you use different fishing strategies in
the common pond and the
private
pond?
5 -why
does common usage lead to exploitation?
6 -what
would be the ideal way to manage the common pond?
7-how does the number of fish received by each
fisher compare to
the maximum possible for each?
8-what
is your management score and what are some ways that you
could use to improve it?
Conclusion:
Briefly
summarize the results of this simulation, and discuss the
implications
of this simulation on the management of common resources in the
environment.
What other resource management examples can you think of where this topic is
relevant? What would you suggest in these situations?